South Africa Conference & Workshop
Protea Hotel, Wonderes, Illovo, Johannesburg 28 - 30 Janurary 2010

 

Presenter Biographies

 

 

DR HELEN WATSON

CURRICULUM VITAE

 

 

watson

Dr Helen Watson obtained all four of her degrees from the former universities of the University of KwaZulu-Natal in Durban, South Africa, where she has also lectured since 1980. Her research and teaching has focused on the use of remote sensing and Geographic Information Systems to assess the effects of land use practices, and to determine land capability potential in sub Saharan Africa. She was the regional coordinator of the European Commission INCO project “Southern African Savannas Network” (www.savannas.net) which evaluated threats to and opportunities for sustainability posed by a wide range of policies and practices in the savannas of four case study countries. She was the principal researcher of the “Agriculture” work package of the “Cane Resources Network for Southern Africa” (www.carensa.net). Also an INCO project, CARENSA evaluated how bioenergy from sugarcane and sweet sorghum could contribute to the sustainable development and global competitiveness of southern Africa. She was coordinator of “Current Land Use Patterns and Impacts” work package on the INCO project “Competence Platform on Energy Crop & Agroforestry Systems for Arid and Semi-arid Ecosystems – Africa” (www.compete-bioafrica.net). COMPETE seeks to enhance the sustainable use of renewable natural resources and stimulate bioenergy implementation in the semi arid and arid regions of sub Saharan Africa. Using eight study countries in west, east and southern Africa, her work involved identifying land in these regions where intensification of, or conversion to bioenergy use, will not have detrimental environmental and/or socio-economic impacts.

 

DESCRIPTION OF PRESENTATION

 

Topic

 

Biofuels Feedstock Production in Africa – the Land Issue

 

Brief Description
The three year INCO project “Competence Platform on Energy Crop & Agroforestry Systems for Arid and Semi-arid Ecosystems – Africa” (www.compete-bioafrica.net) which has just been concluded, sought to enhance the sustainable use of renewable natural resources and to stimulate bioenergy implementation in the arid and semi- arid regions of sub Saharan Africa. COMPETE produced policy guidelines on (a) avoiding the potential conflict between food and bioenergy production, (b) value creation of bioenergy development, and (c) financing and implementing bioenergy projects in Africa. The work described in this presentation was part of the COMPETE project. Its principal objective was to identify land in the arid and semi- arid regions of sub Saharan Africa where intensification of, or conversion to bioenergy use, will not have detrimental environmental and/or socio-economic impacts. Geographic Information Systems were used to interrogate a wide range of data sources. Case studies were made of eight countries. In order to avoid detrimental impacts on biodiversity, all categories of protected areas, closed canopy forests and wetlands were designated as unavailable for bioenergy crop production and filtered out. To avoid food security concerns areas already used for food crops, cash crops and tree crops were also filtered out as unavailable for bioenergy crop production. Lastly, areas with terrain, substrate, and climate unsuitable for bioenergy crop production were filtered out.

 

The areas identified as available and suitable for bioenergy crop production in the eight case study countries are presented in Table 1 below. Arid regions are not represented in Tanzania and Zambia. In the other six countries they range from covering 1.9 to 39.7 percent of the country in the case of Burkino Faso and Kenya, respectively. While none of Burkino Faso’s arid region and less than a third of Mali’s arid region is potentially available and suitable for biofuel crop production, the greater proportion of this region in Senegal, Kenya, Botswana and South Africa is potentially amenable for such production. Semi- arid regions are represented in all eight countries and range from covering 19.8 to 78.0 percent of the country in the case of Mali and Botswana, respectively. The potential for biofuel crop production is least favourable in this region in the West African countries, and most favourable in Kenya and South Africa. Considering available and suitable areas in both the arid and semi-arid regions, South Africa clearly has the greatest potential to accelerate bioenergy crop production. Its potential is 1.9, 2.5, 3.7 and 4.9 times that of Kenya, Botswana, Mali, and Tanzania, respectively.

 

SLIDES FROM PRESENTATION

 

Country

Senegal

Burkina
Faso

Mali

Kenya

Tanzania

Zambia

Botswana

South
Africa

 

Total area km2

 

196 013

 

272 339

 

1 252 281

 

581 871

 

941 375

 

751 920

 

587 337

 

1 221 361

 

Arid region km2

 

14 093

 

5 117

 

389 734

 

230 888

 

n/a

 

n/a

 

128 289

 

378 418

 

Arid region %

 

7.1

 

1.9

 

31.0

 

39.7

 

n/a

 

n/a

 

22.0

 

31.0

km2 of arid available
and suitable

 

10 200

 

0

 

121 397

 

209 760

 

n/a

 

n/a

 

102 193

 

353 937

% of arid available
and suitable

 

72

 

0

 

31

 

91

 

n/a

 

n/a

 

80

 

94

 

Semi-arid region km2

 

97 054

 

144 856

 

248 226

 

227 020

 

316 738

 

160 281

 

453 316

 

522 927

 

Semi-arid region %

 

49.5

 

53.1

 

19.8

 

39.0

 

33.6

 

21.3

 

78.0

 

42.8

km2 semi-arid region
available and suitable

 

5 583

 

22 756

 

71 041

 

169 938

 

147 252

 

67 383

 

189 667

 

368 944

% semi-arid region
available and suitable

 

6

 

15

 

29

 

75

 

46

 

42

 

42

 

70

 

Arid & semi-arid  km2

 

111 147

 

149 973

 

637 960

 

457 908

 

316 738

 

160 281

 

581 605

 

901 345

 

Arid & semi-arid region %

 

56.6

 

55.0

 

50.8

 

78.7

 

33.6

 

21.3

 

100.0

 

73.8

km2 arid & semi-arid
available & suitable

 

15 783

 

22 756

 

192 438

 

379 698

 

147 252

 

67 383

 

291 860

 

722 874

% arid & semi-arid
available & suitable

 

14

 

15

 

30

 

82

 

46

 

42

 

51

 

79

Comparative ranking of
available & suitable

 

8

 

7

 

4

 

2

 

5

 

6

 

3

 

1

 

REFERENCES

 

RELATED PROJECTS AND SUCCESS STORIES

 

Involvement in Similar Projects

 

Success Stories

 

My students have completed the following bioenergy related dissertations:-